Showing posts with label boston raynham andover elderlaw attorneys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boston raynham andover elderlaw attorneys. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Preview of the Proposed New Tax Relief Act of 2010 - Part 2

 

Once again.. this is a preview of what is currently under discussion.  It is NOT law, and should not be looked at as political, legal, or financial advice.  This is only  a brief look at some of the currently debated act, as it impacts our senior clientele.

 

 

Capital Gains and Dividends.
Many of our clients are reliant on their investments.  Here is what is under contemplation regarding Capital Gains and Dividends.

Under discussion it to temporarily extend the current capital gains and dividend rates. Currently  capital gains and dividend rates for individuals below the 25% bracket is equal to zero percent. For those in the 25% bracket and above, the capital gains and dividend rates are 15%. If this portion of the act does not happen, capital gains taxes become 10% and 20% respectively.  Dividends will be subject to the ordinary income rates. This proposal extends the current capital gains and dividends rates for all taxpayers for an additional two years, through 2012.

 

 

Dependent Care Credit
Many of our clients have adult dependent children, or are themselves dependents of their children.  The impact of the dependent care credit is of a direct concern to our elder and disabled clients.   Under discussion is to (temporarily) extend the expanded dependent care credit.  The dependent care credit allows a taxpayer a credit for an applicable percentage of child care expenses for children under 13 and disabled dependents.   The current eligible expenses are $3,000 for one dependent, and $6,000 for two or more dependents.  These are proposed to be extended through 2012.   If the credit falls back to previous rates, it will be only $2,400 for one dependent and $4,800 for two or more dependents.

 

 

Your friends at…

Cohen & Oalican, LLP

Boston ElderLaw Attorneys
Raynham ElderLaw Attorneys
Andover ElderLaw Attorneys

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Scams and our elderly clients

• Unlicensed contractors offering home repairs: "Hey, we just finished a job for the smiths two streets over, and there's leftover tile, would you like a great deal on....."  If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.  Beware of home repair scams.   Look out for transient work crews, strangers claiming to have extra material, free inspections in your home.. All of these should be red flags.  You should look to licensed bonded and insured professionals.  It may feel more expensive at the outset than these street contractors that show up.. but nothing is more expensive than a botched job, or worse, paying and never seeing your money or the work again.  Shop around for a certified contractor insist on a detailed contract on the work to be done, estimated cost and timetable.

• The state of Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs should be notified of any scam, or scam attempt by calling 1-800-243-4636.

If you have been victimized, keeping quiet will not help the next victim in line.  Just last month (October 20/2010) in Ipswitch an elderly citizen was approached by someone saying that they were the recipient of funds from the federal government, and asked to provide personal information in order to claim his windfall.  The man intelligently informed local police, and the scammer was investigated and arrested.  We applaud this anonymous individual.  Our elders cannot be a doormat waiting for the next scam artist to come knocking. 

If you are subjected to a scam, contact local authorities, and your elder law attorney.

 

At Cohen & Olican we take pride in protecting our clients.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Scams and our elderly clients.

Our elder law firm, Cohen & Olican LLP, works hard to protect the rights and assets of our elderly and handicapped clients.  When we champion your rights, it is totally upsetting to us to see our clients preyed on by unscrupulous con artists. 

So, in this article, we are going to do our best to alert you to some of the more common scams, and how to protect yourself.  Of course, should you fall victim to one of these scam artist, turning to professional law enforcement, and your elder law attorney is far more important than protecting yourself from embarrassment.  Acting against these scam artists is the only way to protect the next victim.

You've hear the adage "If it sounds to good to be true......"   Well, frankly, more often than not, it is too good to be true.   Yet still the vulnerable are constantly preyed on by con men and women, leaving financial devastation in their wake.

 

Tomorrow we will present some of the most common scams you should be on the look out for.

Friday, September 10, 2010

MEDCottage or Granny Pod–Part 2

The actual name for the “granny pod” is MEDCottage and it is a type of mobile residential unit that can be rented on a monthly basis. It can be parked in your backyard, you can connect your water and electricity to the unit and it transforms into an independent room for your elderly relatives. This innovative concept is becoming quite popular all over the country, especially in the state of Virginia where the zoning restrictions have been relaxed for these hi-tech homes by the government, which are expected to be available next year.

The MEDCottage has vinyl siding on the exterior and French doors with a white trim around them, while the interiors are fully equipped with a comfortable suite of rooms, with a kitchen and toilet. In short, the MEDCottage is a complete home in itself with all amenities needed to live a safe, comfortable life and ideal for the elderly.

clip_image001

What makes the MEDCottage even more suitable for the elderly is that inside the unit there is state-of-the-art health monitoring equipment and a lift to take an incapacitated person from the bedroom to the bathroom. There is also a camera installed just a foot above the floor that is adequate to view the person’s feet, so if he/she fell down it would immediately be seen. It has been estimated that falls in the home are one of the primary reasons elderly people have to be taken to hospitals and nursing homes, so having this “Feet Sweep” camera would be a big help in the timely assistance in case of such accidents. In addition to these useful conveniences, the MEDCottage has lighting along the floors that would help the elderly in easy movement around the unit. There are monitoring systems that offer regular updates on the medical status of the occupant, like heart rate and temperature and also provide information about medicine intake and other details.

The thought of relegating your older relative in a separate unit in the backyard may not sit easy with most people, but Rev. Dupin says that it is in line with the independent nature of most Americans. The space of the MEDCottage with the family and yet apart is symbolic of American self-reliance and independence. It is not that we can declare loudly that we do not want our older family members in our home, but neither would they wish to live with us. The MEDCottage is an acceptable alternative where the elderly are near their family but are not stepping on anyone’s feet in the process. It is a wonderful way for the older generation to remain part of the family, enjoy the company of their grandchildren and feel safe and content, without being any sort of a burden on others.

clip_image001[4]

Rev. Dupin does not think that his parents would be living in a “granny pod” but certainly visualizes a future where he might be living in the backyard of one of his children.

 

Call one of elderlaw attorneys at Cohen & Oalican, LLP Boston, Andover and Raynham to see if this fits into your  long term care plan.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Your Retirement - Part 3 - FAQ

The Roth IRA

As if the rules described above were not complicated enough, as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 Congress created two new planning vehicles: the Roth IRA, named after Senator William V. Roth (R-Del.) And the Education IRA. The Roth IRA, in effect, turns a traditional IRA on its head. While traditional IRAs permit the taxpayer to shelter pre-tax earnings but taxes them upon withdrawal, the Roth IRA is for after-tax savings, but both the original deposits and the earnings on them are not taxed on withdrawal. In addition, unlike traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs are available to taxpayers already contributing to a plan at work and to taxpayers who continue to work after age 70 ½. Finally, there is no minimum distribution requirement upon reaching that age.

Eligibility for the Roth IRA is limited to taxpayers with an adjusted gross income of under $110,000 if single and $160,000 if married (to be adjusted for inflation after 1998). The contribution is limited to $2,000 a year, with smaller limits for taxpayers with income of between $95,000 and $110,000 if single and between $150,000 and $160,000 if married and filing a joint return.

Financial experts calculate that for many Americans a Roth IRA will save more money than a traditional IRA. This is because the future value of the interest earned, which will never be taxed, often far outweighs the value of deferring taxes on the investment itself. Remember, traditional IRAs may be converted to Roth IRAs this year only! Consult with your financial advisor to help decide if a Roth IRA makes sense for you.

The Education IRA

Similar to the Roth IRA, the new education IRA permits individuals to save up to $500 annually with the earnings accumulating tax free. This may be of special interest to parents and grandparents who can contribute this amount annually to accounts owned by their children and grandchildren. Although $500 a year isn't a lot of money given the size of college tuition, over time it can make a difference. It is only available to taxpayers whose adjusted gross income is under $110,000 for single taxpayers and $160,000 for married taxpayers filing a joint return, with limits on contributions for taxpayers with income between $95,000 and $110,000 and between $150,000 and $160,000, respectively (all numbers to be adjusted for inflation after 1998). If the parents' income exceeds these levels, grandparents and others with lower taxable incomes can contribute to the accounts. But only $500 can be added per child per year.


Funds can only be added to the accounts while the child is under age 18 and must be withdrawn by the time he or she reaches age 30 or turned over into an account for another family member. An advantage with these accounts over most accounts created for children is that the funds do not have to be turned over to the child at age 18. But a word of caution: if you expect that your child or grandchild will apply for financial assistance for college, it may be wiser to invest the money in your own name. The financial aid application process for college has become increasingly complex, but, in general, colleges treat assets held by the family -- especially a grandparent -- differently from assets held by the student.

Only a portion of family assets are expected to be used for a specific student's education, while all of the child's assets are expected to be used before the student draws on financial aid.


Conclusion


While the rules regarding retirement plans are complicated (and the summary above only brushes the surface) the most important lesson is to always name a designated beneficiary and to make sure that you name individuals only. (You can also name a trust that meets certain requirements beyond the scope of this article.) The second lesson is to consult with a qualified professional advisor when you reach 70 ½, if not before.

Cohen & Oalican, LLP provide a full spectrum of services for the elderly, for disabled adults, and for the families.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Your Retirement - Part 2 -FAQ

To Fix or Recalculate, That is the Question


The second consideration is not so straightforward. At your required beginning date, you may elect the "fixed" or "recalculation" method of determining your minimum distributions. As their names imply, under the first approach the portions of your retirement plan that you must withdraw is based on your life expectancy and that of your designated beneficiary on the required beginning date and it never changes. Under the second approach, you withdraw a bit less than under the fixed approach each year because your life expectancy and that of your designated beneficiary are recalculated each year. The choice makes little difference during the first few years, but the longer you live the better off you are with the recalculation method. Under the fixed approach, when you and your spouse reach age 90 you will have withdrawn everything. But if one of you reaches that age your life expectancy will still be five years, meaning that you would only have to withdraw one fifth of what remained in your plan that year if you had opted for the recalculation method.


On the other hand, if you choose the recalculation method after one of you dies, you will have to base future distributions on the survivor's life expectancy alone. If one spouse dies at a young age, this choice could accelerate minimum distributions. So, what's the best approach? Some experts recommend always using the fixed methods. Others recommend always using the recalculation method unless you or your spouse has a shortened life expectancy for one reason or another. In short, there's no answer that's right for everyone. What you choose may depend on predictions of your longevity and that of your spouse based on your health and the lifespan of other family members. If you designate someone other than your spouse as your beneficiary, you may not elect the recalculation method with respect to his life expectancy, only for your own.


Post-Death Treatment of Retirement Plans

What happens to retirement plans after the participant dies depends on whether the decedent had named a designated beneficiary, whether that designated beneficiary is the decedent's spouse, and whether the participant died before or after her required beginning date. If the participant dies before her required beginning date and has not named a designated beneficiary, all of the plan must be distributed before the end of the fifth calendar year after her death. This is often referred to as the five-year rule. On the other hand, if the decedent had named a designated beneficiary, the assets may be distributed over the beneficiary's life expectancy. If the beneficiary is not the decedent's spouse, the distributions must begin by the end of the calendar year after the participant died. If the beneficiary is the surviving spouse, distributions must begin by the end of the calendar year in which he reaches age 70 ½ or the calendar year after the participant's death, whichever is later.

Again, these rules show the importance of designated a beneficiary. Without a designated beneficiary, the heir must take distributions of the entire plan within five years and pay income taxes on such distributions. With a designated beneficiary, the heir can take distributions over his life expectancy, which for a 38-year-old child, for instance, would be 44.4 years. The ultimate difference to the heir may total hundreds of thousands of dollars over time, depending on the value of the retirement plan. You may designate more than one beneficiary, but the minimum distributions will be based on the life expectancy of your oldest beneficiary. Don't name a non-person, such as a charity, as a beneficiary of your plan or the five-year rule will apply to all of your beneficiaries.

If the plan participant dies after her required beginning date, again the outcome depends on whether she named a spouse as her designated beneficiary. If she did not designate a beneficiary, the heirs would be required to withdraw the entire plan within one year of the death of the participant.

The spouse has an option not available to other designated beneficiaries. He can roll the plan over into his own plan and it will be treated as if he had always been the owner. This means he can postpone withdrawals until his required beginning date and designate a new beneficiary.

A non-spouse designated beneficiary may withdraw from the plan based on her life expectancy and that of the decedent (unless the decedent elected the recalculation method, in which case the beneficiary must make withdrawals based on her life expectancy alone). Note, that in cases where the beneficiary is considerably younger than the decedent, this will allow smaller distributions than before the plan participant's death since the beneficiary will no longer be deemed to be only 10 years younger than the participant.

In part 3 we will discuss the different IRA's

Cohen & Oalican, LLP provide a full spectrum of services for the elderly, for disabled adults, and for the families.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Your Retirement - Part 1 - FAQ

This series will cover some Frequently Asked Questions:

Your Retirement
Following are the basic rules governing taking minimum distributions from retirement plans and a few pointers for getting the most out of them.

Calculating Your Minimum Distribution
Congress created the rules described below to encourage saving for retirement. They imposed a penalty for early withdrawal and a penalty for failure to withdraw once the owner reaches retirement age. Until last year, there was also a penalty for excess withdrawals, in other words for those who saved more than they need for retirement, but that has been repealed.


These penalties are in the form of excise taxes. Withdrawals (with limited exceptions) before age 59 ½ are subject to a 10 percent excise tax. The plan participant must begin taking distributions by the April 1 occurring after he or she reaches age 70 ½ (known as the required beginning date), or pay a whopping 50 percent excise tax on the amount that should have been distributed but was not.

In general, the advantage of retirement plans is that the participant may save income before taxes during his or her working career and continue to have such savings grow without paying taxes until the funds are withdrawn. This permits the retirement savings to grow at a much faster rate than other savings and investments. The participant must pay taxes on any amounts withdrawn. As a result, it usually makes sense to postpone withdrawals for as long as possible.

The amount the participant must withdraw after reaching age 70 ½ is based on her own life expectancy and that of the person she names to receive the plan after her death, known as the designated beneficiary. At the required beginning date, your life expectancy will be either 15.3 years or 16.0 years, depending on whether you have reached your 71st birthday before the applicable April 1. If you have not designated a beneficiary, you will have to withdraw this portion of your plan at that time that is 1/16th (assuming you're 70 years old on your required beginning date). In other words, if your plan holds $160,000, you'll have to withdraw $10,000 or pay a penalty.

On the other hand, if, for instance, you have named your spouse as your designated beneficiary and you are both 70 years old, your joint life expectancy will be 20.6 years, meaning that you can withdraw a smaller portion of your retirement plan each year -- only $7,767 from a plan holding $160,000. In the first year alone, this would permit you to continue to invest an additional $2,233 tax free and save more than $700 in income taxes (depending on your tax rate). The savings can be even greater if you name someone younger than yourself as a designated beneficiary, but if you choose someone who is not your spouse, he or she will always be deemed to be no more than 10 years younger than you.

You can always change designated beneficiaries after you have reached the required beginning date, but they can never be used to reduce your minimum distributions. This means that if you have no designated beneficiary on your required beginning date, you will always be stuck making withdrawals based on your own life expectancy. So, the first rule of retirement plans is to always designate a beneficiary.

Part 2: To Fix or Recalculate, that is the question.

Cohen & Oalican, LLP provide a full spectrum of services for the elderly, for disabled adults, and for the families.